Microservices.io is brought to you by Chris Richardson. Experienced software architect, author of POJOs in Action and the creator of the original CloudFoundry.com. His latest startup is eventuate.io, a microservices application platform.
Chris offers a comprehensive consulting services, workshops and hands on training classes to help you use microservices effectively.
Avoid the pitfalls of adopting microservices and learn essential topics, such as service decomposition and design and Kubernetes. Find out more
Chris offers a comprehensive set of resources for learning about microservices including articles, an O'Reilly training video, and example code.Learn more
Want to see an example? Check out Chris Richardson's example applications. See code
Join the microservices google group
Transaction outbox pattern
A service typically need to atomically update the database and publish messages/events. For example, perhaps it uses the Saga pattern. In order to be reliable, each step of a saga must atomically update the database and publish messages/events. Alternatively, it might use the Domain event pattern, perhaps to implement CQRS. In either case, it is not viable to use a distributed transaction that spans the database and the message broker to atomically update the database and publish messages/events.
How to reliably/atomically update the database and publish messages/events.
The application that uses a relational database inserts messages/events into an outbox table (e.g.
MESSAGE) as part of the local transaction.
An application that uses a NoSQL database appends the messages/events to attribute of the record (e.g. document or item) being updated.
A separate Message Relay process publishes the events inserted into database to a message broker.
This pattern has the following benefits:
This pattern has the following drawbacks:
Application architecture patterns
Cross cutting concerns