A service command typically needs to update the database and send messages/events. For example, a service that participates in a saga needs to atomically update the database and sends messages/events. Similarly, a service that publishes a domain event must atomically update an aggregate and publish an event.
A service must atomically update the database and send messages in order to avoid data inconsistencies and bugs. However, it is not viable to use a traditional distributed transaction (2PC) that spans the database and the message broker to atomically update the database and publish messages/events. The message broker might not support 2PC. And even if does, it’s often undesirable to couple the service to both the database and the message.
But without using 2PC, sending a message in the middle of a transaction is not reliable. There’s no guarantee that the transaction will commit. Similarly, if a service sends a message after committing the transaction there’s no guarantee that it won’t crash before sending the message.
In addition, messages must be sent to the message broker in the order they were sent by the service.
They must usually be delivered to each consumer in the same order although that’s outside the scope of this pattern.
For example, let’s suppose that an aggregate is updated by a series of transactions
This transactions might be performed by the same service instance or by different service instances.
Each transaction publishes a corresponding event:
T1 -> E1,
T2 -> E2, etc.
E1 must be published before
How to reliably/atomically update the database and send messages/events?
A service that uses a relational database inserts messages/events into an outbox table (e.g.
MESSAGE) as part of the local transaction.
An service that uses a NoSQL database appends the messages/events to attribute of the record (e.g. document or item) being updated.
A separate Message Relay process publishes the events inserted into database to a message broker.
This pattern has the following benefits:
This pattern has the following drawbacks:
This pattern also has the following issues:
Microservices.io is brought to you by Chris Richardson. Experienced software architect, author of POJOs in Action, the creator of the original CloudFoundry.com, and the author of Microservices patterns.
Chris helps clients around the world adopt the microservice architecture through consulting engagements, and training workshops.
Got a specific microservice architecture-related question? For example:
Consider signing up for a two hour, highly focussed, consulting session.
My virtual bootcamp, distributed data patterns in a microservice architecture, is now open for enrollment!
It covers the key distributed data management patterns including Saga, API Composition, and CQRS.
It consists of video lectures, code labs, and a weekly ask-me-anything video conference repeated in multiple timezones.
The regular price is $395/person but use coupon KGBJMRAM to sign up for $195 (valid until March 8th, 2023). There are deeper discounts for buying multiple seats.
Take a look at my Manning LiveProject that teaches you how to develop a service template and microservice chassis.
Chris offers numerous resources for learning the microservice architecture.
Chris teaches comprehensive workshops, training classes and bootcamps for executives, architects and developers to help your organization use microservices effectively.
Avoid the pitfalls of adopting microservices and learn essential topics, such as service decomposition and design and how to refactor a monolith to microservices.
Delivered in-person and remotely.
Want to see an example? Check out Chris Richardson's example applications. See code
Engage Chris to create a microservices adoption roadmap and help you define your microservice architecture,
Use the Eventuate.io platform to tackle distributed data management challenges in your microservices architecture.
Eventuate is Chris's latest startup. It makes it easy to use the Saga pattern to manage transactions and the CQRS pattern to implement queries.
Engage Chris to conduct an architectural assessment.
Note: tagging is work-in-process
anti-patterns · application api · application architecture · architecting · architecture documentation · assemblage · dark energy and dark matter · deployment · design-time coupling · development · devops · docker · glossary · hexagonal architecture · implementing commands · implementing queries · inter-service communication · loose coupling · microservice architecture · microservice chassis · microservices adoption · microservicesio updates · multi-architecture docker images · observability · pattern · refactoring to microservices · resilience · sagas · security · service api · service collaboration · service design · service discovery · service granularity · service template · software delivery metrics · success triangle · team topologies · transaction management · transactional messaging
Application architecture patterns
Refactoring to microservicesnew
Cross cutting concerns