Many enterprise applications are large, complex monoliths that are developed by large teams that struggle to keep up with the needs of the business. Consequently, adopting the microservice architecture is an appealing option. As you might expect, migrating to microservices requires an enterprise to tackle numerous technology related challenges. But enterprises also encounter obstacles that have less to do with technology and more to do with strategy, process, and organization.
This post is the first in a series about microservices adoption anti-patterns that I have observed while working with numerous clients around the world. Unlike a regular pattern, which is a (problem, solution) pair, an anti-pattern consists of three elements:
Let’s look at the first anti-pattern.
One anti-pattern that I’ve observed is the belief that a sprinkle of microservices will solve all of your development problems. Sadly, this is not the case. The microservice architecture is simply an architectural style that has good deployability and testability. It’s a loosely coupled architecture that enables high velocity, autonomous teams and DevOps style development.
The microservice architecture won’t, for example, address an inadequate development and deployment process. Many enterprises, for example, rely on manual testing done by a separate QA team. Similarly, they often use a manual deployment process. And, sometimes the code code is messy, overly complex and difficult to understand. There might even be duplicate and diverging code bases. The microservice architecture doesn’t address these problems and adopting it could very well be the equivalent of pouring gasoline on a fire.
To avoid this anti-pattern, it’s important to understand three things. First, you need understand the underlying root causes for your software delivery issues. Is it your development and deployment process? Your organization? Or perhaps your monolith has outgrown its architecture. Second, you need to understand the problems that the microservice architecture addresses. Hopefully, the two sets of problems intersect. Finally, you need to understand the prerequisites, such as automated testing, that you need to have in place in order to be successful with microservices.
Microservices.io is brought to you by Chris Richardson. Experienced software architect, author of POJOs in Action, the creator of the original CloudFoundry.com, and the author of Microservices patterns.
Chris helps clients around the world adopt the microservice architecture through consulting engagements, and training workshops.
Chris teaches comprehensive workshops for architects and developers that will enable your organization use microservices effectively.
Avoid the pitfalls of adopting microservices and learn essential topics, such as service decomposition and design and how to refactor a monolith to microservices.Learn more
Chris offers numerous other resources for learning the microservice architecture.
Want to see an example? Check out Chris Richardson's example applications. See code
Got a specific microservice architecture-related question? For example:
Consider signing up for a two hour, highly focussed, consulting session.
My virtual bootcamp, distributed data patterns in a microservice architecture, is now open for enrollment!
It covers the key distributed data management patterns including Saga, API Composition, and CQRS.
It consists of video lectures, code labs, and a weekly ask-me-anything video conference repeated in multiple timezones.
The regular price is $395/person but use coupon MECNPWNR to sign up for $120 (valid until May 16th, 2023). There are deeper discounts for buying multiple seats.
Take a look at my Manning LiveProject that teaches you how to develop a service template and microservice chassis.
Engage Chris to create a microservices adoption roadmap and help you define your microservice architecture,
Use the Eventuate.io platform to tackle distributed data management challenges in your microservices architecture.
Eventuate is Chris's latest startup. It makes it easy to use the Saga pattern to manage transactions and the CQRS pattern to implement queries.
Engage Chris to conduct an architectural assessment.
Note: tagging is work-in-process
anti-patterns · application api · application architecture · architecting · architecture documentation · assemblage · beer · containers · dark energy and dark matter · deployment · design-time coupling · development · devops · docker · eventuate platform · glossary · hexagonal architecture · implementing commands · implementing queries · inter-service communication · kubernetes · loose coupling · microservice architecture · microservice chassis · microservices adoption · microservicesio updates · multi-architecture docker images · observability · pattern · refactoring to microservices · resilience · sagas · security · service api · service collaboration · service design · service discovery · service granularity · service template · software delivery metrics · success triangle · tacos · team topologies · transaction management · transactional messaging