Microservice Architecture
Supported by KongAnti-pattern: microservices as the goal
In a previous post, I described the Microservices are a magic pixie dust anti-pattern. Another anti-pattern that I’ve observed is an organization making the adoption of microservices the goal. An executive might, for example, announce a microservices transformation initiative and expect every development team to “do microservices”. Development teams then scramble to “do microservices”. Perhaps, a team’s annual or quarterly bonus is affected by how well they “do microservices”. In an extreme case, it might be depend on how many microservices they have deployed.
Consequences
On the one hand, adopting microservices is a major undertaking and high-level support is essential. But on the other hand, the problem with making microservices the goal is that it ignores other obstacles to rapid, frequent and reliable software delivery including:
- Inefficient processes and practices - waterfall process, manual testing, manual deployment
- Silo’d organization - e.g. development hands off code to QA for testing.
- Poor software quality - the application is a big ball of mud, the code is anything but clean, etc.
An organization that suffers from these problems might not benefit from adopting microservices. It might even make things worse. Also, requiring a team to adoption microservices, risk imposing an architecture on a development team even when it does not make sense for their application.
A better approach
A much better goal is to increase the velocity, frequency and reliability of software delivery. Specific, there are four key metrics to track and improve:
- Lead time - time from commit to deploy
- Deployment frequency - number of deploys per day per developer
- Failure rate - how often deployments fail
- Recovery time - time to recover from an outage
Each application development team is then responsible for improving these metrics for their application. Sometimes the microservice architecture plays a key role in improving this metrics. But there are other things that can be done to improve these metrics. For example,
- Increasing lead time - eliminate wasteful work, automation, etc.
- Increasing deployment frequency - automated testing and deployment, etc
- Reducing failure rate - automated testing, automated deployment, GitOps, etc.
- Reducing recovery time - improved monitoring, automating recovery, etc.
To learn more
- Read my Microservices patterns book
- Read or watch my O’Reilly Software Architecture conference keynote
- Talk to me about my microservices consulting and training services
- Learn more about microservices at adopt.microservices.io
microservices adoption anti-patterns software delivery metrics
About Microservices.io
Microservices.io is brought to you by Chris Richardson. Experienced software architect, author of POJOs in Action, the creator of the original CloudFoundry.com, and the author of Microservices patterns.
Chris helps clients around the world adopt the microservice architecture through consulting engagements, and training workshops.
MICROSERVICES WORKSHOPS
Chris teaches comprehensive workshops for architects and developers that will enable your organization use microservices effectively.
Avoid the pitfalls of adopting microservices and learn essential topics, such as service decomposition and design and how to refactor a monolith to microservices.
Learn moreLEARN about microservices
Chris offers numerous other resources for learning the microservice architecture.
Get the book: Microservices Patterns
Read Chris Richardson's book:
Example microservices applications
Want to see an example? Check out Chris Richardson's example applications. See code
Remote consulting session
Got a specific microservice architecture-related question? For example:
- Wondering whether your organization should adopt microservices?
- Want to know how to migrate your monolith to microservices?
- Facing a tricky microservice architecture design problem?
Consider signing up for a two hour, highly focussed, consulting session.
Virtual bootcamp: Distributed data patterns in a microservice architecture
My virtual bootcamp, distributed data patterns in a microservice architecture, is now open for enrollment!
It covers the key distributed data management patterns including Saga, API Composition, and CQRS.
It consists of video lectures, code labs, and a weekly ask-me-anything video conference repeated in multiple timezones.
The regular price is $395/person but use coupon MECNPWNR to sign up for $120 (valid until May 16th, 2023). There are deeper discounts for buying multiple seats.
Learn how to create a service template and microservice chassis
Take a look at my Manning LiveProject that teaches you how to develop a service template and microservice chassis.
BUILD microservices
Consulting services
Engage Chris to create a microservices adoption roadmap and help you define your microservice architecture,
The Eventuate platform
Use the Eventuate.io platform to tackle distributed data management challenges in your microservices architecture.
Eventuate is Chris's latest startup. It makes it easy to use the Saga pattern to manage transactions and the CQRS pattern to implement queries.
ASSESS your architecture
Consulting services
Engage Chris to conduct an architectural assessment.
Join the microservices google group
Topics
Note: tagging is work-in-process
anti-patterns · application api · application architecture · architecting · architecture documentation · assemblage · beer · containers · dark energy and dark matter · deployment · design-time coupling · development · devops · docker · eventuate platform · glossary · hexagonal architecture · implementing commands · implementing queries · inter-service communication · kubernetes · loose coupling · microservice architecture · microservice chassis · microservices adoption · microservicesio updates · multi-architecture docker images · observability · pattern · refactoring to microservices · resilience · sagas · security · service api · service collaboration · service design · service discovery · service granularity · service template · software delivery metrics · success triangle · tacos · team topologies · transaction management · transactional messaging
